Far uvc lamp
![far uvc lamp far uvc lamp](https://faruv.lighting/firstuvc/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Far-uvc-lights-Quantalamp-close-up-F-Series-FirstUVC-24V-Far-UVC-222nm-20-watt-Excimer-far-uvc-222nm-20-watt-Lamp-f28-24v-dc-2-400x615.jpg)
Thus far, the mouse finding is consistent with most human safety studies of far-UV, Brenner said, such as a letter in a recent issue of the journal Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine. The research team, he said, will continue their mouse study for at least another few months-until they’ve collected data based on 60 weeks of daily far-UV exposure to the mice. “We see no difference between any of the exposure and the control ,” the interim report says.
Far uvc lamp skin#
However, Buonanno said, “We have an ongoing study in which mice are exposed to light five days a week, eight hours a day.” The 96 (hairless) mice in the study are given regular exams to discover if their skin has reacted to the radiation or if their eyes have been adversely affected.īrenner shared a recent preliminary report after 43 weeks of far-UV exposure for the mice. The same goes for the eyes direct exposure to regular UV-C can cause eye damage. Photo: Manuela Buonnano/Columbia University While far-UV won’t make it through even a fraction of the 5-to-10-micrometer-thick layer of dead skin on a person’s body, at least some UV-C light could make it through to live skin cells, where that UV-C might either kill them or render them cancerous.Īpparatus for exposing airborne virus to a far-UVC lamp. Compare that to traditional UV-C light (with a 254-nm wavelength), whose tissue penetration depth is ten times longer, at 3 µm. That effectively also translates to a shorter distance traveled through human and animal tissue - according to Brenner’s colleague Manuela Buonanno, associate research scientist at the Center for Radiological Research and specialist in far-UV’s effects on biological systems.īuonanno said that the proteins in tissue cut the intensity of a 222-nm far-UV beam in half after traveling just 0.3 micrometers. Nevertheless, Brenner said, they’re now extending their work to include the effect of far-UV on the novel coronavirus, too.)įar-UV light has a shorter wavelength than traditional UV-C, which means it carries more energy per photon. (The group’s work examined far-UV’s effect on other airborne coronaviruses, which they say will very likely have the same response as the SARS-CoV-2 novel coronavirus. So we had anticipated that by the next flu season, these things would start to be installed.”Īccording to a new study produced by Brenner’s group that is currently undergoing peer review, a lamp emitting far-UV light, bathing a room in 222-nm ultraviolet light at levels beneath the current industry threshold limit, would inactivate 99.9 percent of coronaviruses in the air in under 25 minutes.
![far uvc lamp far uvc lamp](https://faruv.lighting/firstuvc/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Far-uvc-lights-Quantalamp-close-up-F-Series-FirstUVC-24V-Far-UVC-222nm-20-watt-Excimer-far-uvc-222nm-20-watt-Lamp-f28-24v-dc-3-600x923.jpg)
“We were focused on influenza, which in some sense is the same story: airborne transmission. “All the research we’ve been doing over the years was obviously not about COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2,” he said. That difference only increases the possible leap forward that far-UV light fixtures could represent with respect to taming the coronavirus pandemic, says David Brenner, director of Columbia University’s Center for Radiological Research.īrenner and collaborators have been studying far-UV’s sterilizing effects against microbes and viruses for more than a decade, he said in an interview this week. And far-UV ultimately stands or falls on its own terms, apart from the well-established UV-C technologies-whose effectiveness against viruses and bacteria are well known, although direct exposure to longer-wavelength UV-C is also known to be harmful to human skin and eyes. All safety and efficacy findings for far-UV are, for all their promise, still preliminary. That’s because KrCl lamps produce 222-nanometer UV efficiently enough that they might soon be broadly deployed for disinfection of hospitals, doctors offices, grocery stores, office buildings, shopping centers, airports, trains, airplanes, public transit, elevators or potentially anywhere that people gather in indoor spaces. If the initial promise of so-called “far-UV” pans out, prepare to hear the words “krypton-chlorine excimer lamp” more widely later this year and into 2021. Two studies-one now under peer review, and one reporting preliminary results from an ongoing experiment-bolster the case that this UV is safe for human eyes and skin. A short-wavelength ultraviolet light technology, beyond the decades-old mercury lamp, may be the most promising breed of UV yet studied for killing airborne coronavirus and other viruses and bacteria.